Reminder: in PPA, 100 is average, higher is better and replacement level is 45. But some readers prefer it so I’m including PPA scores as well. In small sample sizes, the numbers can get weird. PPA is a per possession metric designed for larger data sets. The scale is the same as points and reflects each player’s total contributions for the game. Game Score (GmSC) converts individual production into points on the scoreboard in this game. PPA is my overall production metric, which credits players for things they do that help a team win (scoring, rebounding, playmaking, defending) and dings them for things that hurt (missed shots, turnovers, bad defense, fouls). In a single game, the raw numbers in each category are easier to understand.įour Factors: Timberwolves 107 at Wizards 115 FOUR FACTORSīelow are a few performance metrics, including the Player Production Average (PPA) Game Score (very similar to the one I used to call Scoreboard Impact Rating).
Reddit outlast 2 full#
While the factors are usually presented as percentages, that’s more useful over a full season. Four Factorsīelow are the four factors that decide who wins and loses in basketball - shooting (efg), rebounding (offensive rebounds), ball handling (turnovers), fouling (free throws made). The Timberwolves entered the game winners of 8 of their last 11, and they had the league’s 7th ranked defense. This was a decent win for the Wizards, by the way. He could probably be more aggressive looking for his shot, but his game management was solid last night. His defense wasn’t bad, and he contributed 11 assists in a variety of ways - finding teammates in transition (3), drive-and-draw (3), set plays (2), hitting a cutter, swinging the ball and a funky drive-and-kick where he drove across the court at about the foul line level, forced a defensive reaction and then hit Beal in the corner for a three. Spencer Dinwiddie’s low grade for the game is almost exclusively due to his atrocious 1-9 shooting (1-7 from three-point range). Even with his poor shooting, the offense was better with him out there.
Reddit outlast 2 free#
Bertans was 3-4 from three-point range.īeal was inefficient on offense (just 8-20 shooting, 1-5 from three, 2-4 from the free throw line), but he had 3 offensive rebounds (and 3 defensive boards) and 9 assists. Gafford and Harrell were helped by Davis Bertans snapping out of his shooting funk to score 15 points on 6 field goal attempts. The bulk of their attempts were at-rim or from three-point range. Washington Wizards shot distribution in their win against the Minnesota Timberwolves. The bulk of their field goal attempts came at-rim or from three. and the coaching staff was likely pleased with the team’s shot distribution, even if they were once again under 30% from three-point range. At the risk of getting overly technical, that’s good.
Against Minnesota’s gossamer interior defense, Gafford and Harrell combined for 45 points on 18-22 shooting, as well as 15 rebounds, 4 assists and 3 blocks. Shot chart for Washington Wizards centers Daniel Gafford and Montrezl Harrell. Courtesy NBA.com, here’s last night’s shot chart for centers Daniel Gafford and Montrezl Harrell. The Wizards’ offense was better than it had been much of the season - primarily because of their ability to generate an abundance of at-rim attempts. The Washington Wizards rode dominating performances from their tag team centers Daniel Gafford and Montrezl Harrell to outlast the Minnesota Timberwolves 115-107 last night.
0 kommentar(er)
